Abstract Argumentation and Values
نویسندگان
چکیده
Argumentation and Values Trevor Bench-Capon and Katie Atkinson
منابع مشابه
Arguments About Values
Arguments are more or less persuasive depending on the values their outcomes promote and demote. This idea, closely related to Perelman’s ideas work on argumentation, has been formally modeled by Bench-Capon in his well-known Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks, based on Dung’s abstract argumentation. In this paper, the question is addressed how arguments about which values are promoted and de...
متن کاملAbstract Argumentation and Explanation
Argumentation and Explanation Christian Strasser and Dunja Šešelja {christian.strasser, dunja.seselja}@UGent.be Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University Abstract. In this paper Dung’s abstract argumentation framework (cp. [6]) is extended with explanatory capabilities. Further, we investigate bipolar argumentation systems (cp. [4]), incorporate values (cp. [3]) and generaliz...
متن کاملArgumentation Context Systems: A Framework for Abstract Group Argumentation
We introduce a modular framework for distributed abstract argumentation where the argumentation context, that is information about preferences among arguments, values, validity, reasoning mode (skeptical vs. credulous) and even the chosen semantics can be explicitly represented. The framework consists of a collection of abstract argument systems connected via mediators. Each mediator integrates...
متن کاملA self-correcting iteration schema for argumentation networks
Given an argumentation network with initial values to the arguments, we look for a numerical algorithm yielding extensions compatible with such initial values. We offer an iteration schema that takes the initial values of the nodes and follows the attack relation producing a sequence of intermediate values that eventually becomes stable leading to an extension in the limit. The schema can be us...
متن کاملSome Theoretical Results on the Relationship Between Argumentation and Coherence Theory
This work provides initial results on the relationship between argumentation and Paul Thagard’s coherence theory. We study the relationship, via appropriate transformations, between different types of coherent graphs (according to the values in the arcs) and different argumentation frameworks such as Dung’s abstract argumentation framework, weighted argument systems or preference-based argument...
متن کامل